The phrase white supremacy is used to be dismissive over people with perspectives like mine. The issue with it fundamentally is that I, as well as many others in the alt-right, are in fact, not white nationalists, nor supremacists, nor separatists.
Alt-Right simply means multiculturalism doesn’t work, let’s try something else, and we have to take some initiative to do it ourselves because the American “right-wing” is hardly right-wing at all.
A white nationalist wants an ethnostate, where non-whites are non-existent. I just want freedom from diversity. I’d like to be able to move to an all-white neighborhood, if I choose. To hell with what you think about it. It’s my right not to have to associate with people I don’t want to. I’d like to be able to work with mostly whites if I can. Why? Because they’re the most likely to relate to, and thus get along with. Sadly, I don’t have these freedoms. Minorities seem to though. Nobody gets mad at Mexicans, Asians, and whoever for saying, “Yah, I kinda wanna be with my own kind.” Whites are the primary victims of being told, “You have racial pride? That’s stupid.”
A white supremacist thinks whites are the best. Now, this you literally cannot prove unless you’re a mind-reader, or someone has explicitly told you that they are one. So if you throw this phrase around to people who wouldn’t describe themselves using it, you’re in fact claiming that which you don’t know to be true, which makes as you foolish as fundamentalist Christians that “know” God is real. You actually don’t know a goddamn thing, and you’re likely coming off as a racist jackass to everyone with an IQ exceeding 60. Besides, even if I did think whites were the top notch human beings (which that honor obviously goes to the Asians), who gives a shit?! That doesn’t inherently mean that I don’t see value in non-whites. That would just simply mean that I think whites are capable of more than any other race, which like I said replace whites with Asians, and I’m pretty much there. I do think Asians are best. I mean that sincerely. That said, I don’t want their population here to exceed what it is, nor do I want that for any non-white group. Because it’s not about who’s superior. It’s about who’s—fucking—land it is. Leftists think it’s everybody’s and anybody’s. The American “right-wing” (yes I refuse not to put that in quotes, every time.) thinks it belongs to everybody in America (*jerk motion*), and the alt-right thinks, “Hey, all these roads, schools, businesses, and innovations we take for granted today were put here for us by our ancestors. Is it really logical to be trusting it in the hands of a majority population that’s not of our land, and thinks pitiably of our morals and values?”
A white separatist is someone who believes in segregation and using force to obtain it. I believe in the natural tendency and efficiency of segregation, considering we are a tribal species—something of which will never change. However, I don’t desire mass deportation of minorities. I would like to incentivize them to return to their ancestral homelands however. I would also like it if immigration stopped for a while, and if we made it illegal for minorities to reproduce more than once, over the next century or two. The people who made this land should maintain majority status and keep democratic control over it. Why? Because it’s—fair? We’ve obviously got our national interests in of better mind than any strangers to our Western, capitalist way of life.
No, that doesn’t mean I’m in favor of giving this land back to the Native Americans. Because they’ve had it a lot longer than we have, and they didn’t do shit with it, except set up some drum circles and sing about Buffalos. We took this land from them, yes. But we transformed it into something better. Giving it back wouldn’t make any sense now, especially considering we still have Reservations, Casinos, tax benefits for those poor, oppressed engines. So, yea. Sorry Chief of the Diversity Tribe, this is a white man’s issue for the most part.
Gentrification and white privilege are two concepts that must leave the collective American consciousness, if you want people like me to “fuck off”. So when you hear your bratty, Starbucks coffee sippin’, BLM shirt wearing, activist-wannabe friends talking about this shit, keep the yin and yang symbol in mind. I don’t dislike other races, people. But I loathe entitlement. This country does not magically become “your’s” after learning just enough English to come over here and run a convenience store. A country becomes your’s if you can identify with it, and contribute something of value to it. Both of which are majorly subjective, of course so I must qualify these terms. To identify with a nation is to have enough characteristics with the majority in common, to self-actualize and gain the system anywhere within it. For example, I do not identify with Somalia. For even if I were black, I still don’t know the first fucking thing about how their government (or lack thereof, if we’re not kidding ourselves here) works. So I can’t identify with it. Likewise, they can’t identify with the United States.
For something you’ve contributed to have value, it must affect lives in a measurable, positive way that couldn’t be done otherwise. Henry Ford for example is pretty much solely responsible for everyone using cars today. Because until Ford, you had to make cars by hand and they were ridiculously expensive. Now, it doesn’t have to be on the scale and influence of Ford. I’m not that picky. But your work needs to be capitalized on, like having a scientific paper cited. That means that your work wasn’t in vein. It allowed other work to happen.
Speaking of that, according to Jordan Peterson (whose probably the least-biased source I can point you to), about 80% of Humanities papers are never cited once. What that essentially means is that social science students are worthless. If only a mere 20% of students are producing papers worth citing, that means that there’s clearly something about the classes that leads this to happen. A whole 80% of people don’t just submit the same kind of fuckin’ papers in over and over, and never get cited a single goddamn time. Something just doesn’t add up. Hmm, could it be that social science professors don’t actually teach, but just stand there and project their insecurities onto you in the form of Marxism in disguise as egalitarianism—also known as feminism? No, couldn’t possibly be.